Copenhagen, Denmark

Artur Kvade.

Growth Product Manager

I turn product questions into clear priorities, testable ideas and improvements the team can deliver.

Open to opportunities in Copenhagen

  • Full-time
  • Project / Contract
  • Part-time Consulting
Download CVPDF
Artur Kvade wearing a navy blazer
Insight. Intent. Impact.

For hiring teams

A product role with ownership.

Growth Product Manager / Product Owner. 6+ years in IT, across product decisions and hands-on delivery.

For founders & product teams

A clearer next product decision.

Find funnel friction, evaluate an opportunity or choose what to build next—with a concrete plan to act on.

01 /How I create product value

From evidence to a better product.

I combine analytical product thinking with hands-on delivery: understand the problem, choose a direction and learn from what ships.

  1. 01

    Understand

    Combine user needs, product signals and business context to define the problem.

    OutputProblem brief
  2. 02

    Prioritize

    Choose a testable hypothesis using evidence, expected value and delivery constraints.

    OutputA testable priority
  3. 03

    Deliver

    Align stakeholders and work with the team to ship a focused change.

    OutputFocused improvement
  4. 04

    Learn

    Measure the result, check the assumptions and decide what to do next.

    OutputNext decision

Learning feeds the next priority

Working process: understand, prioritize, deliver and learn. Feed the learning back into prioritization.

02 /Selected growth impact

What changed. Where it mattered.

Selected results from my Product Manager role at NDA / iGaming, 2024–2026.

Product growth

Conversion & transactions

+12%

Conversion uplift

Identified a high-performing product section and initiated its prioritization and visibility.

~50

Additional successful transactions / month

Identified and resolved a hidden, critical issue in the transaction funnel.

Operational efficiency

Time & processing

~40

FTE hours saved / month

Reduced operational workload by driving resolution of a high-impact business issue.

18%

Faster request processing

Aligned business requirements, KPIs and priorities for an internal CRM workflow.

Discovery & delivery

Work volume · not business outcomes

110+

Product ideas generated & validated

Built a strong backlog of opportunities for future product improvements.

73+

Tasks in the 2026 roadmap

Translated research and analysis into a structured roadmap aligned with business goals.

Reported career results. Approximate figures retain their original qualifiers; they are separate from the independent studies below.

03 /Independent product research

The thinking behind the proposal.

Three studies showing how I frame a problem, choose a first move and define what to learn.

Danske Bank

Banking · Self-service

Make everyday banking clearer

Independent research. No internal data. Recommendations not implemented.

Problem
Customers can struggle to obtain the right statement or understand a payment status, creating avoidable support work.
Read product reasoning
Evidence
Public documentation and user-reported friction. Exports, PIN viewing and spending categories already exist; discoverability and clarity are the questions.
Proposed solution
Improve statement selection, PIN recovery guidance and transaction timelines so customers can finish tasks with less uncertainty.
First / later
First: audit support reasons and test these three service flows. Defer PIN-change infrastructure, dynamic CVV and P2P extensions until feasibility and costs are validated.
How I would test it
Proposed checks: task completion and avoidable contacts per completed task. Validate incremental value, security and actual cost reductions before treating freed capacity as savings.

Source: proposal and evidence appendix, PDF pages 3–13 and 16–19.

Limitations
No authenticated app walkthrough. Financial figures in the PDF are illustrative scenarios; feature variants, costs and demand need validation.
Read full study PDF · EN — Danske Bank

Green.dk

B2B commerce · Lead qualification

Match the journey to the intent

Independent research. No internal data. Recommendations not implemented.

Problem
Buyers, sellers and service customers share a generic B2B enquiry path, leaving needs unclear and adding sales follow-up.
Read product reasoning
Evidence
The research identifies one generic B2B page and form. Its journey review flags unclear routing, phone-field friction and gaps in buyer reassurance—not measured drop-off.
Proposed solution
Offer four intent paths: buy, sell, repair and IT lifecycle / ESG. Use email-first contact, an optional phone field and relevant, verifiable trust information.
First / later
First: segment intent, simplify the form, add verified trust signals and instrument the funnel. Next: bulk valuation and routing. Validate demand before building a buyback calculator.
How I would test it
Proposed checks: form completion by intent, qualified-lead rate, time to quote and sales follow-up effort. Compare against a measured baseline, not the mockup figures.

Source: journey proposals and prioritisation, PDF pages 2–8.

Limitations
No funnel baseline or buyer interviews in the supplied study. Mockup prices, customer examples and compliance claims require verification.
Read full study PDF · EN — Green.dk

tamigo

B2B SaaS · Mobile workflows

Help teams act on shift changes

Independent research. No internal data. Recommendations not implemented.

Problem
Deskless employees may miss schedule changes; managers then spend time reminding people and coordinating across channels.
Read product reasoning
Evidence
The presentation reviews scheduling, shift bids, company information and email screens. It frames adoption and coordination problems as hypotheses, without usage or incident data.
Proposed solution
Make shift changes explicit through notifications and a “what changed” view; reduce access friction and bring schedules into employees’ calendars.
First / later
First: validate change visibility, biometric login and calendar sync. Next: contextual shift chat and role-based onboarding. Defer payroll validation, an integration marketplace and recognition features.
How I would test it
Proposed checks: time to notice a change, successful shift coordination and manager follow-up effort. Monitor notification fatigue, login failures and retention in a pilot.

Source: workflow concepts and prioritisation, PDF pages 2–8.

Limitations
Feature availability, role permissions and platform constraints need checking. The study provides no baseline proving missed shifts or a retention effect.
Read full study PDF · EN — tamigo

04 /Focused product support

Useful work. Clear deliverables.

Choose the decision you need help with. We agree the scope, inputs and deliverables before starting.

01

A map of funnel friction

You receiveA friction map and prioritized investigation and test plan.

When & how
When
Users drop off, but the cause is unclear.
What I do
Review stages, data quality and key user journeys.
02

A competitive opportunity shortlist

You receiveA journey comparison, opportunity gaps and ranked hypotheses.

When & how
When
You need a clearer position in the market.
What I do
Compare relevant competitors, journeys, features and positioning.
03

A discovery brief worth acting on

You receiveAn opportunity brief with evidence, assumptions and next questions.

When & how
When
The next growth opportunity is uncertain.
What I do
Investigate user needs and underperforming product areas.
04

Metrics that support decisions

You receiveA metric map with definitions and a measurement-gap checklist.

When & how
When
Reports exist, but priorities remain unclear.
What I do
Review KPIs, funnel definitions and measurement gaps.
05

An experiment-ready hypothesis

You receiveA test brief with metrics, guardrails and decision criteria.

When & how
When
An idea needs evidence before investment.
What I do
Define the hypothesis, experiment and success criteria.
06

A roadmap with explicit trade-offs

You receiveA prioritized backlog, rationale and a sequenced roadmap.

When & how
When
Too many initiatives compete for capacity.
What I do
Compare user value, business impact, evidence and dependencies.
07

A practical workflow improvement plan

You receiveA workflow map and prioritized changes with clear owners.

When & how
When
Handoffs and manual work slow delivery.
What I do
Map bottlenecks and clarify ownership across teams.
08

A scoped AI workflow prototype

You receiveA prototype, documented prompts and a quality-review checklist.

When & how
When
Repeated research or analysis consumes team time.
What I do
Explore AI-assisted research, prompts, analysis and automation.

05 /Ways we can work together

Choose the working relationship.

Full-time

Long-term ownership

Long-term ownership of growth, discovery, priorities and cross-functional delivery within your product team.

Project / Contract

A defined challenge

A defined product challenge, with agreed scope and deliverables for a fixed engagement.

Part-time / Hourly

Focused product support

Targeted help with analysis, discovery, prioritization or improving how work gets done.

06 /Experience

A foundation in delivery.

Product and project management experience, now based in Copenhagen.

May 2026 – Present

Danish Language Programme & DRC Office Internship

Copenhagen

  • Learning Danish and participating in courses on Danish society and the local labour market.
  • Supporting Ukrainian refugees at the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) with translation, job search and practical digital services.

Mar 2024 – Apr 2026

Product Manager

NDA / iGaming

  • Researched 15+ competitors and translated findings into product improvements.
More outcomes
  • Reduced cross-department delivery timelines by approximately one-third through ownership and proactive follow-up.
  • Built structured CRM documentation from scratch, improving team and stakeholder efficiency and increasing productivity by one-third.

Nov 2022 – Mar 2024

Project Manager

Yedynka

  • Delivered projects within scope, time and budget, achieving 97% client satisfaction and 3 new contracts through referrals.
More outcomes
  • Increased team efficiency and delivery speed by 35% through structured workflows and processes.
  • Automated workflows with AI tools, saving 3–4 hours per week.

Jan 2021 – Nov 2022

Project Manager

OnPage

  • Managed multiple projects, achieving 90% client retention and increasing long-term contracts by 20%.
More outcomes
  • Increased project profitability by 13% through structured change request management.
  • Improved team efficiency through CI/CD, saving ~12 team hours per month.
Explore the full experience in my CV

07 /The first 90 days

The first 90 days, in phases.

An indicative plan, adapted to the product, team and available evidence.

An indicative 90-day sequence
  1. Days 1–30Understand
  2. Days 31–60Prioritize
  3. Days 61–90Test & learn

Days 1–30

Understand the baseline

  • Audit key product metrics and funnel performance.
  • Understand the roadmap, constraints and business goals.
  • Align with stakeholders and the team.

Days 31–60

Choose what to test

  • Identify friction points and potential growth levers.
  • Prioritize quick wins and bigger bets.
  • Shape hypotheses and an initial improvement or experiment backlog.

Days 61–90

Deliver, learn and focus

  • Launch improvements or experiments.
  • Build feedback loops and measure results.
  • Refine priorities for the next roadmap cycle.

A working approach, not a delivery guarantee. Timing and outcomes depend on the product and context.

Intended outcomes
  • Clearer priorities
  • Faster decision-making
  • Visible growth opportunities
  • Measurable product learning

08 /Let’s talk

A role to discuss. A problem to solve.

Artur KvadeGrowth Product ManagerCopenhagen, Denmark